What was actually said about PvP in the new shard was this:
[[
Q: Will there be open-world PvP?
The Ultima Online: New Legacy shard will support open world Player vs Player combat using an updated Vice Vs Virtue framework.
]]
source: https://uo.com/ultima-online-new-legacy/
I guess that could mean that it'll be the open PvP PK-fest that UO was before Trammel but it doesn't sound like it. Sounds like it'll have Factions.
[[People have long asked for a retro shard, a "classic"
shard. But we have always been told the coding was lost, notebooks were
burned or some such excuses.]]
There's no indication that it was "excuses" and every indication that this was accurate information. However everyone who knows how coding works was also clear that there were few limits on what could be produced if one was willing to start from scratch.
Folks such as yourself also liked to point to the illegal free shards as an example of how a custom rules shard could be viable. The best reply to that was, and remains: Do not underestimate people who have time on their hands, no profit motive, no corporate or legal considerations, and are dedicated to a certain goal. As another example, ever wonder how mods for Skyrim can in some cases exceed the original game in quality? As yet another example, ever wonder how people can use deep fake technologies to improve on the special effects that made young Luke Skywalker in The Mandalorian?
In all three cases (UO free servers, Skyrim mods, and The Mandalorian fan edits), and It's because you're talking about a bunch of folks who know this stuff well, have no profit motive, have time on their hands, and are extremely dedicated. Professionals, by contrast, are doing this for their living, not for their hobbies, and want time to pursue whatever their hobbies are. (And even someone who works on UO but has modding Skyrim as a hobby is not going to want to go home from working on UO and work some more on UO. They're just not.) They also have to worry about quaint stuff like "profits," "break-even points," and "corporate permissions." And, oh yeah, they don't care about the (admittedly small but quite real) possibility of, say, lawsuits or copyright enforcement.
While we're talking about this, let's talk about whether or not this new shard is a "classic" shard (that's NOT the right term for what you all wanted because almost everyone who wanted this wanted something extra beyond what was available in any given era of the game):
[[
Q: Is Ultima Online: New Legacy an Ultima Online Classic Shard?
There is no magic dial to turn back Ultima Online
to a specific era. Times have changed and expectations have moved past
what the landscape of MMORPGs was like in 1997 and beyond. So in
short, no, this is not a 1:1 recreation of a classic UO server in any
given era. What we have done, however, is to rekindle the magic and
nostalgia that drives the core desire to experience a classic server.
As we have stated, we have completely rethought, reworked, and
redesigned several core gameplay experiences with the goal of rekindling
the classic experience of Ultima Online – focused on keeping true to the roots of Ultima as an RPG!
]]
source: same link as above.
So not only is not a "classic" shard but it specifically said it wasn't.
Now as stated before, you could code anything you want from scratch if you had the right resources so sure they could make a new game that looked, felt, and played exactly like old UO, probably right down to the dial-up lag, the "PKs open bank box in a dungeon so no risk of losing loot from a kill hack," and the "castle deed dupe." But it would cost a lot, I suspect. And be pointless.
Now is the new shard coded from scratch or using existing resources? Either way it's a depressing waste of time and money and I don't care.
Now let me be clear: This new shard is going to be a disaster for a lot of reasons that I'll get into some other time, and I increasingly am offended by the team's focus on it. So I'm not saying this as a supporter of this new endeavor.
Rather I'm saying it as someone who feels that these sorts of discussions should have, you know, facts and reason and stuff.