Thoughts
Thoughts
Ikeelu said:Simple as that. No transfers in or out. Please let us play all game content on easy mode on a shard that is in a vacuum. Housing rules still apply.
Thoughts
Canceled_Sub said:I guess Ikeelu beat me to this one. This came up on stratics. Seems like a very effective solution to the games problems. Wanted to add that there are at least 20-30 people ready to quit over this issue (that we know about). I'm willing to bet it's higher than that.
I'm not trying to convince anyone to quit, either. Before you say that just consider what certain players are wanting. Don't treat your customers like dirt. Simple really.
There's no magical reason to keep power scrolls as PvP only. A Trammel Shard with all content is a great idea. No xfers in or out.
Edit: A message to moderators. There are fewer active users here than on stratics. If you want to know why, it's the moderation. Go ask them.
I see no issue with a felucca shard. However, I predict a trammel shard would be way more popular.Mervyn said:i think you’re making a mistake calling a fel only shard a “pvp shard”. I would play it mainly as a crafter. Not for pvp.
Biggest line of BS I have ever heardCanceled_Sub said:Wanted to add that there are at least 20-30 people ready to quit over this issue (that we know about). I'm willing to bet it's higher than that.
Canceled_Sub said:I think the real fear of this is that it would ruin the other shards. Most of the population would want to play on the Trammel shard in peace. They want to avoid the toxic griefers. They would start over to avoid PVP. The idea is very popular. They’d probably make a mountain of cash as people bought character tokens to quickly build.
A trammel shard could still have consensual guild vs guild pvp. Just require both guilds to declare war before its allowed. That would be a balanced approach. None of us would have to participate, ever.
Remember runescape made a pvp server for its game and it lasted about 6 months before they pulled the plug. Bulk majority is not interested in pvp.
I don't think you really get it, there is no fear. 🙂
We are begging to send all the easy mode players off somewhere so they can destroy the game and the economy all to themselves, without dragging the game itself down.
We'd also love a fair and equal Felucca only shard to match.
The only thing stopping this, is the developers, it's down to their concept of workload, what it would mean for the game, how would it really play out - would it be genuinely better or worse for the game, they are probably scared to try it.
As for Stratics, versus the moderation here, the moderation here is fine, I usually end up being moderated by all sides, due to the fact I'm very blunt and logical in a way that people cannot handle, it causes too much controversy, I get it. Stratics is only more popular because this site is brand new, and this site only caters to live players, as opposed to Stratics that has many inactive players posting tons of rubbish. But to be fair, some of that is valid also. Both sites have a purpose - you can discuss things more freely on Stratics across a wider range, but here, you know you are talking to genuine players only, which also has its advantages.
Runescape was not known for its PvP - UO has in its time been known for some of the most fluid fast paced fun PvP going. Though dismount is of course currently ruining that flow.
Canceled_Sub said:Runescape currently has 1 million subscribers, and has breached 1 billion in revenue. Similar games, one has no pvp. It’s not rocket science. UOs pvp isn’t good.
I myself have held up Runescape as a way forward for UO, yes I agree it is having phenomenal success.
The reason why, is they have stuck to their guns, and their roots, they've not forgotten what they are all about, and their vision.
They've focussed on the retro style and simplicity, they are not having to run an enhanced client in tandem... Retro games are back.
https://oldschool.runescape.com/
"Relive the challenging levelling system and risk-it-all PvP" - That is their opening sentence...
Odd line to have for a game with no PvP? Currently 136,000 players logged in.
Superfrog said:i doubt it would ruin the other shards, there would be a rush to try out the novelty of it for a couple of months, then most people would get bored as they have everything they need quickly with no worry that the local PK is going to find you before you finish that spawn for the 1000th time. The whole experience would start to feel like shooting fish in a barrel. you'd have a small dedicated group that would stay there and some folks that would play off and on. it is doubtful that the devs have the resources to add a new shard, or even convert a third one, plus it would mean they have three different rulesets to manage which would further delay bug fixes and optimizations to the clients. best to just leave it be and work on bugs fixes and client improvements.
LMAO talk about trying to misquote stats. That is a total subs over its life not current subs and that is 1 billion in total revenue in is life not current revenue.Canceled_Sub said:Runescape currently has 1 million subscribers, and has breached 1 billion in revenue. Similar games, one has no pvp. It’s not rocket science. UOs pvp isn’t good.
Runescape has 1 million subs right now. The 1 billion is over it’s life.Bilbo said:LMAO talk about trying to misquote stats. That is a total subs over its life not current subs and that is 1 billion in total revenue in is life not current revenue.Canceled_Sub said:Runescape currently has 1 million subscribers, and has breached 1 billion in revenue. Similar games, one has no pvp. It’s not rocket science. UOs pvp isn’t good.
Canceled_Sub said:
To the other person on runescape pvp. It’s not forced and there’s nothing you can’t obtain if you avoid it.
I'll agree the "forcing" thing can be an issue.
I feel forced into Trammel, for such things as town buffs, to experience all the new style facets, 99% of events, 90% of all the other artefact drops, all new content.
You only get "forced" into Felucca for 1 thing, I wish I could be in your boat right now.
Ikeelu said:
Game is garbage, again. Thanks for forcing “PvP content” on us.
Thanks for forcing the snowflake generation on us. 🙂
The snowflake generation has to deal with the world that your generation created. We don't want to waste our time working through your broken world, so we look to find solutions. Thanks for trolling us though.Cookie said:Ikeelu said:
Game is garbage, again. Thanks for forcing “PvP content” on us.
Thanks for forcing the snowflake generation on us. 🙂
Why is anyone with an intelligent logical opinion that doesn't match yours, a troll or a griefer?
See it so much these days.
You could have debated with me, you'll notice I wasn't against some of your proposals, just think you've both got that whole histrionic thing going on.
Next thing I'll know, you'll start some sort of #witchhunt movement against me.
Awesome.
Garth_Grey said:A majority of players, from both sides of the fence, are simply not touching this conversation, not sure why.
No idea. 😂
My friend Rorschach must be asleep, he wouldn't normally let me get this far.
Standard snowflake response. You can be thankful for the world we have created because if it wasn't for people like us you wouldn't have the ability of free speech.Canceled_Sub said:The snowflake generation has to deal with the world that your generation created. We don't want to waste our time working through your broken world, so we look to find solutions. Thanks for trolling us though.Cookie said:Ikeelu said:
Game is garbage, again. Thanks for forcing “PvP content” on us.
Thanks for forcing the snowflake generation on us. 🙂
@ikeelu - originally I came into this thread to say no issues, have your Trammel shard. I'd also like the same for Feluccan's, note we are limited in our gameplay far more than you are. I'm a blue anti pk by the way in Felucca. I dominate champ spawns when I want to, the reds have lost the battle on our shard when we play. 🙂
Then this other guy came in, moaning about moderators, saying how we are scared for this idea to happen, and how Runescape is such a great game compared to this, because it has no pvp…
a. Not scared of the idea, no issues with it, I've pushed the same thing myself.
b. I'm one of the most heavily moderated guys on both Stratics and UO.Com, and I have no issues with either forums fairness.
c. He was using such incorrect data relating to Runescape, pvp and the reasons for its success, I had to correct him, can't let such false arguments be used.
There you go.
@Canceled_Sub - Thanks for continuing to call me a troll because my opinion differs and you cannot comprehend how anyone could have a different opinion to your own. I don't cause grief to anyone to be fair, so again, you are making baseless assumptions.
I read that Runescape put PvP on the backburner, because they were trying to combat the effect of RMT sites, and the fact players were buying the best equipment for RL cash to PvP with... Nothing to do with the fact PvP was not popular, but keep on spinning your yarns.
You are shocked players are having fun? I can understand, seeing your delicate viewpoints.
And as you say, I'd love them to create an Easymode game shard for you and all of your kind to clear off to.
Would you be kind enough to support an all Felucca style facet in return, or are you too scared it would be too popular, and no-one would actually go to your stale Trammel server?
I thought in a Tram only rule set shard there would be no player killing so how would VvV work?Ikeelu said:If they created shards Vice and Virtue one being a fel ruleset shard and one being a tram ruleset shard with no xfers in or out, I think they would appeal to their player base.
A player can dream.
I have nothing further to contribute
Mods? Come on. Lol. This is the UO experience in a nutshell. Good luck all.Bilbo said:LMAO You go to FEL and die and you call that griefing, what a joke. Easy fix stay out of FEL and stop whining like a little baby.
Must be real hard with all the carebears camping the city stones waiting to kill you.Cookie said:
I'll agree the "forcing" thing can be an issue.
I feel forced into Trammel, for such things as town buffs, to experience all the new style facets, 99% of events, 90% of all the other artefact drops, all new content.
Oh but they do. They do have quite a lot to loose, which is why the opposition is so vicious. If the bulk of PvMers leave to this shard, what do you think will happen to the PS prices? That's the most lucrative income source in the game that PvPers already feel entitled to. And not just that, Where will they find easy targets to keep themselves entertained? Fighting other PvPers gets old fast (see the fate of any open world PvP game), and you are threatening to take the easy kills away form them. Separating the victims from the predators takes away both a very good source of income and a very fun (for them) playstyle.Ikeelu said:@ Cookie sadly you can’t debate here, you can simply state your opinion and leave or the thread is locked.
However, If you pvp fine, keep it up. If you pk fine, keep it up. If you want to live out your UO days in Fel fine, keep on keepin on. But please tell me why you are in this thread? The only responses should have been voices for this idea. You lose nothing if something like this were implemented, or do you?
Ikeelu said:Do you see the circle jerk here? Why do you think people cheat? Should I cheat to grief this griefer? Should I just RMT powerscrolls? Give me a solid soloution. I’ll try whatever, I have till the end of the month paid.
I have a few solutions. 1) Transfer to a dead shard. Scout them for days to see who's on when you play. Farm until your bank is full and transfer back. I know lots of people that do this. 2) If you keep being raided by one lone person you need to pick another spawn besides despise. No single person is going to scout every single spawn during your time every single day. 3) Invest in a friend. Strength in numbers but you'll have to split the rewards.
Regarding the original topic, it seems the main reason is to give players a shard that they can get PS without worrying about PKs. This is the main, underlying reason right?Ikeelu said:Simple as that. No transfers in or out. Please let us play all game content on easy mode on a shard that is in a vacuum. Housing rules still apply.
Thoughts
I don't agree with the fact about getting killed to try to earn some power scrolls but I know that it is part of the game and is needed. If tram had unlimited access to PS what would be the challenge or fun, it would be boring. The red players are restricted to fel and they do not have any of our areas to farm for things like artifacts like we do in fel so they protect their source of income. We may not like it or want to admit it but i believe the game needs both. We would be diminished as a whole if we lost one side or the other. Plus think about it this way if the situation was reversed how would we feel?Sliss said:Oh but they do. They do have quite a lot to loose, which is why the opposition is so vicious. If the bulk of PvMers leave to this shard, what do you think will happen to the PS prices? That's the most lucrative income source in the game that PvP'ers already feel entitled to. And not just that, Where will they find easy targets to keep themselves entertained? Fighting other PvPers gets old fast (see the fate of any open world PvP game), and you are threatening to take the easy kills away form them. Separating the victims from the predators takes away both a very good source of income and a very fun (for them) playstyle.Ikeelu said:@ Cookie sadly you can’t debate here, you can simply state your opinion and leave or the thread is locked.
However, If you pvp fine, keep it up. If you pk fine, keep it up. If you want to live out your UO days in Fel fine, keep on keepin on. But please tell me why you are in this thread? The only responses should have been voices for this idea. You lose nothing if something like this were implemented, or do you?