🧙‍♂️ Brought to you by Peptides.gg — Use code UO20 for 20% off — GLP-1's, 90+ Peptides and more!

private house with vendors?

Started by Grimbeard · 2022-11-01 · 15 posts · General Discussions
#0

how is this possible? i thought a house had to be public to have vendors?


#3
"their house was Condemned with vendors already inside "

If the house gets saved after going Idoc and the owners do not set their house back public, the vendors can still sell. Seen a few houses like that. No idea if they can be restocked without setting back to public tho. We can let Yoshi test that.
#4
Marge said:
"their house was Condemned with vendors already inside "

If the house gets saved after going Idoc and the owners do not set their house back public, the vendors can still sell. Seen a few houses like that. No idea if they can be restocked without setting back to public tho. We can let Yoshi test that.
Would this be considered an exploit? They have knowingly stocked it ?
#5
No idea. It would have been stocked before going into idoc. No idea if they are able to be stocked after.
#6
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public? 
#7
Grimbeard said:
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public? 
So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..

New account same broken record.
#8
Pawain said:
Grimbeard said:
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public? 
So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..

New account same broken record.
Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housing 
#9
Grimbeard said:
Pawain said:
Grimbeard said:
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public? 
So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..

New account same broken record.
Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housing 
So did you report it or just come here and whine about it.
#10
Grimbeard said:
Pawain said:
Grimbeard said:
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public? 
So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..

New account same broken record.
Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housing 
So did you report it or just come here and whine about it.
Well i came here to report it after verification that it's an exploit 
#11
“What is actually the problem?
why does it matter that it’s private house?”
#12
Yoshi said:
“What is actually the problem?
why does it matter that it’s private house?”
Because you can't place a vendor in a private house 
#13
“right, but what’s the actual problem?”
#14
Grimbeard said:
Grimbeard said:
Pawain said:
Grimbeard said:
Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public? 
So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..

New account same broken record.
Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housing 
So did you report it or just come here and whine about it.
Well i came here to report it after verification that it's an exploit 

This is not the correct place to report an exploit. Report in game through the help menu using the 'harrasment' option or through the contact form
← Browse more General Discussions discussions