2022-11-01 15:53
#0
how is this possible? i thought a house had to be public to have vendors?
I saw that discussion yet clearly the vendor i bought from was in a private homeMarge said:
Would this be considered an exploit? They have knowingly stocked it ?Marge said:"their house was Condemned with vendors already inside "If the house gets saved after going Idoc and the owners do not set their house back public, the vendors can still sell. Seen a few houses like that. No idea if they can be restocked without setting back to public tho. We can let Yoshi test that.
So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..Grimbeard said:Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public?
Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housingPawain said:So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..Grimbeard said:Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public?
New account same broken record.
So did you report it or just come here and whine about it.Grimbeard said:Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housingPawain said:So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..Grimbeard said:Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public?
New account same broken record.
Well i came here to report it after verification that it's an exploitLord_Frodo said:So did you report it or just come here and whine about it.Grimbeard said:Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housingPawain said:So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..Grimbeard said:Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public?
New account same broken record.
Because you can't place a vendor in a private houseYoshi said:“What is actually the problem?
why does it matter that it’s private house?”
Grimbeard said:Well i came here to report it after verification that it's an exploitLord_Frodo said:So did you report it or just come here and whine about it.Grimbeard said:Same principle its against the rules to have vendors in private housingPawain said:So the vendor blocks a bridge? Get over defending cheaters and exploiters..Grimbeard said:Honestly it was a rhetorical question as it's clearly an exploit no different than say trinsic bridge houses i expect @ Mesanna will be deleting them if not changed to public?
New account same broken record.