T-Map revert (3rd try)

The 2nd thread was closed again for being supposedly in violation of rule 7:

1. No Trolling - Do not post comments which have the sole purpose of causing an argument. You may express your opinion on a topic however, abuse to anyone who doesn't have the same opinion as you will not be tolerated.

However, this was a mistake by @Mariah, as there clearly no abuse and the topic at hand is meant for a serious discussion.

I will just open a new thread and ask again:

Is it time to revert the T-Map nerf?

Give it up, they don't care, the 'revamp' we got was clearly what they intended from the start, they never put anything back to how it was, no matter how upset people get or how much they hate it. Despise Trammel and ugly, badly designed 'New' Haven are just two examples.

Y'alll are gonna mess around and get spanked.

jaytin said:

Give it up, they don't care, the 'revamp' we got was clearly what they intended from the start, they never put anything back to how it was, no matter how upset people get or how much they hate it. Despise Trammel and ugly, badly designed 'New' Haven are just two examples.

An even better example is Magincia.  Remember, we were told we would have a hand in rebuilding it.  But the only say we really had was in how much we would bid on a trailer house lot.

Hey Magincia is a magical wonder !! It's completely flourishing on Siege, and a ghost town on LA.

I’ve not seen any issues with my Davies, but they are old and on Siege. I will check again later today though. I really hope they didn’t all revert

At least if we could have rebuilt Haven and Magincia it would have appeased those that were so upset about it, IF it went back to how it was before....but like that 'player generated quest system' mentioned at the Anniversary party, it was probably just too hard to bother with!

Wow, I guess we will all get banned if we have the wrong point of view.  Truth hurts I guess, now I remember why I stopped posting the last time...

It's simple, want to complain? Be constructive, don't single people out and avoid poor language choices.  Do that and you can be as vindictive and full of wrongthink as you want afaik.  

For some people, it's a matter of respect.  And some people around here just havent earned it.  
If they want us to respect them, they need to earn that, it isn't a hard concept to grasp.

It isn't given automatically, nor lightly.
 

Uriah_Heep said:

For some people, it's a matter of respect.  And some people around here just havent earned it.  
If they want us to respect them, they need to earn that, it isn't a hard concept to grasp.

It isn't given automatically, nor lightly.
 

What he said!

JollyJade said:

Is it time to revert the T-Map nerf?

 😂 

Old Davies fine, the one I claimed a few days ago not so fine.  Goes back to other UO forums now that are not so Fanboi to the point of being obtuse and arbitrary.  

JollyJade said:

The 2nd thread was closed again for being supposedly in violation of rule 7:

1. No Trolling - Do not post comments which have the sole purpose of causing an argument. You may express your opinion on a topic however, abuse to anyone who doesn't have the same opinion as you will not be tolerated.

However, this was a mistake by @ Mariah, as there clearly no abuse and the topic at hand is meant for a serious discussion.

I will just open a new thread and ask again:

Is it time to revert the T-Map nerf?

Your thread was probably locked because it was not constructive in ANY form. If the last 20 years has taught you anything, it should be that they do not work hard on publishes to "revert" them.

What MissE posted was an example of constructive feedback [if you have never seen it before.]

Apparently the last 20 years hasn't taught you that a Banned User can't see your replies...just sayin.

Garth_Grey said:

Apparently the last 20 years hasn't taught you that a Banned User can't see your replies...just sayin.

doesn't that just stop them from logging in?
I can view the forums on my cell phone without having to log in.

Yeah I suppose.

Cinderella said:

Garth_Grey said:

Apparently the last 20 years hasn't taught you that a Banned User can't see your replies...just sayin.

doesn't that just stop them from logging in?
I can view the forums on my cell phone without having to log in.

I could read them, but not answer 🙂

From my 10 last threads, this is the only one still open! C'mon @Mariah you can do better.

I've given up on your apology though (see OP)... not gonna happen... in fact never saw you apologize for anything... hmmm

IBTL

Good luck JJ lol

See ya.. take care guys

The JollyJade show continues..

Nikard said:

JollyJade said:

The 2nd thread was closed again for being supposedly in violation of rule 7:

1. No Trolling - Do not post comments which have the sole purpose of causing an argument. You may express your opinion on a topic however, abuse to anyone who doesn't have the same opinion as you will not be tolerated.

However, this was a mistake by @ Mariah, as there clearly no abuse and the topic at hand is meant for a serious discussion.

I will just open a new thread and ask again:

Is it time to revert the T-Map nerf?

Your thread was probably locked because it was not constructive in ANY form. If the last 20 years has taught you anything, it should be that they do not work hard on publishes to "revert" them.

What MissE posted was an example of constructive feedback [if you have never seen it before.]

They don't work on publishes to revert them.
And most times, if a bug slips in, they don't work to fix that either...they leave it up to the players to find a workaround.

But it's still the best game around, in  spite of this crew.   I just play the old stuff that has been around a while

Well since you are quitting.  Bye Bye.  I am glad I wont have to read your insults and nonsence anymore.

This thread is closed.