Forum Moderator Performance
I do have one concern. I noticed the name of one of the mods in game. This concerns me deeply since we must use our account names to log in.
I'm not sure what information could be gathered or if this was an imposter but it gave me an uneasy feeling if someone were to go rogue.
IBL
https://forum.uo.com/discussion/3188/moderator-bias#latest
You shouldn't be using a screenname that's the same as your account login.Urge said:
I do have one concern. I noticed the name of one of the mods in game. This concerns me deeply since we must use our account names to log in.
UO has no unique naming requirement so hundreds of players could be running around with the same names.
I've seen the thread cleanups which to me seemed warranted. No complaints there.
One for sure thing that I have noticed is that the same handful of posters tend to commandeer and derail threads with back & forth arguing. On topic or not this usually devolves into personal attacks and the thread being closed.
You would have been banned fron here and UO if I were a Moderator. Count yourself lucky.Ikeelu said:Just a civil discussion about the moderators on this forum and how well they do their job. Express your opinions and vote in the poll. I hope to get this thread to people at Broadsword as well as EA. If they close the thread it will still be telling.
Ezekiel_Zane said:You shouldn't be using a screenname that's the same as your account login.Urge said:
I do have one concern. I noticed the name of one of the mods in game. This concerns me deeply since we must use our account names to log in.
UO has no unique naming requirement so hundreds of players could be running around with the same names.
My login is very much different.
For some reason I was expecting the mods here to be in house employees or GMs and not actual players. With the exception of Mesanna, very rarely have I ever seen a player with the same name as team members or GMs.
I was somewhat nervous about the possibility of players gaining access to login info. After all, we just had an issue of mistrust from an EM not long ago.
I was assured via inbox that no mod can see any login or personal information and that was in fact just a duplicate name.
LOL. Too funny.Pawain said:You would have been banned fron here and UO if I were a Moderator. Count yourself lucky.Ikeelu said:Just a civil discussion about the moderators on this forum and how well they do their job. Express your opinions and vote in the poll. I hope to get this thread to people at Broadsword as well as EA. If they close the thread it will still be telling.
I think you will find out that the MODs are employees of UO, maybe on the same line as EMs. UO does not use volunteers.Urge said:Ezekiel_Zane said:You shouldn't be using a screenname that's the same as your account login.Urge said:
I do have one concern. I noticed the name of one of the mods in game. This concerns me deeply since we must use our account names to log in.
UO has no unique naming requirement so hundreds of players could be running around with the same names.
My login is very much different.
For some reason I was expecting the mods here to be in house employees or GMs and not actual players. With the exception of Mesanna, very rarely have I ever seen a player with the same name as team members or GMs.
I was somewhat nervous about the possibility of players gaining access to login info. After all, we just had an issue of mistrust from an EM not long ago.
I was assured via inbox that no mod can see any login or personal information and that was in fact just a duplicate name.
The truth is, most people are discussing this game on other forums who have a lighter, more freedom oriented approach. Reddit, Stratics, and random forums have more users than this forum does. That's because moderators won't let the debates carry out.
However, you cannot silence the critics, because we go elsewhere and share out thoughts, and reach more of a population than we would here.
This game is being mismanaged by Broadsword. Period. EA needs to pull the contract and decide what the future of this game will be. If they want to move forward, and aim for 1 million subscriptions like Runescape, they need to revisit most of the threads that have been shutdown on this forum.
That's it. Good luck.
Canceled_Sub said:(BLAH, BLAH, BLAH)
However, you cannot silence the critics, because we go elsewhere and share out thoughts, and reach more of a population than we would here.
(BLAH, BLAH, BLAH)
AmberWitch said:It's a relief to have a forum that provides for contrary opinions to be expressed in a no flaming, no trolling allowed environment.
Clearly you must not read all the posts here. More trolls and flames than in any UO Forum I read.
Also see more bans here for expressing opinions.
There needs to be more bans tho.
And for the record, I am NOT a troll.
More of an ogre I think...
For the love of god don't tell EA this game is still running.Victim_Of_Siege said:@ Ikeelu How much longer are you going to let this run before sending the results to Broadsword and EA?
😂Captain_Lucky said:For the love of god don't tell EA this game is still running.Victim_Of_Siege said:@ Ikeelu How much longer are you going to let this run before sending the results to Broadsword and EA?
You guys rock.
I love this. Nice disarming. I also think all of the Moderators are doing a great job. There are a lot of great and knowledgeable people here, but you know what they say, "It only takes one to spoil the bunch" Opps, my age is showing. Lol.Drake said:To be perfectly honest, you all make our jobs easy. It is nice to see the kind words and constructive criticism. We do hear your suggestions and we use them towards achieving the goal of making this the best forum experience possible. Thank you for being an awesome community.
You guys rock.