are you using a 30 year old pc with a CRT monitor yeah it would be fine for you then.I am playing UO since 1997. I only ever played the 2D Client (Classic Client). I am still playing happily with it today. Not sure what "breaking the game" and "unplayable" for you is?
*points to signature*
no just the Classic UO client the better one nothing elseSable said:My laptop died and I just bought a new laptop. Playing on 2d just fine. What illegal 3rd party program are you using with it that you can't do without? Does it rhyme with phaser?
Yeah, I'm using classic and I have noticed no difference. What has changed for you? Offer up specifics so at least the dev team can look into what might be wrong. Oh and also be sure it's the changes broadsword has made causing the problems. The majority of issues I wind up encounter are due to windows updates that I have to go back through and clean up issues that "New Microsoft Content" causes.GiMpY said:no just the Classic UO client the better one nothing elseSable said:My laptop died and I just bought a new laptop. Playing on 2d just fine. What illegal 3rd party program are you using with it that you can't do without? Does it rhyme with phaser?
Oh, I'm not familiar with that.McDougle said:He means classicUO not the classic client
username said:Boohoo. I love all these people complaining about the client never ever mention they used it to multibox/script specifically to gain an advantage over other players and rmt. Nope, always the 'need muh 60fps' lie.
Good, quit, cya.
Urge said:username said:Boohoo. I love all these people complaining about the client never ever mention they used it to multibox/script specifically to gain an advantage over other players and rmt. Nope, always the 'need muh 60fps' lie.
Good, quit, cya.
Agreed. Even OutL**ds has a hard stance on this crap.
A hard stance on what? I use it to make the player screen full size - oh noes. That's honestly the biggest benefit I get and it's crucial to the game being playable.
My characters are basically all 100 or 120 in skills, and I buy my ore, I don't even really use macros - I mean, I have one that simply selects my pickaxe.. that's all it does. Another simply selects the shovel and then the treasure map when i'm digging for treasure. I have another that takes the tedious nature of selecting wool and clicking to make cloth. Those are the only ones I can even think of. None even used unattended. I could generally exist without Razor, wouldn't want to, but It's not crucial. Probably could manage to do what I do with macros in the regular client, or most of it.
ClassicUO though IS crucial to the game functioning in any sort of enjoyable manner.
As I said in another post, no, I don't cheat or have any interest in cheating - why? I've got endless gold - my characters are developed - I don't pvp - I don't even mine. Seriously, I just want to play the game - and I'm not going to play it using a what, 4" by 4" inch player screen - it's terrible, it's insulting. I settled for it in the 1990's because that's what existed, now there's no excuse for it. You have practically no paying players and you do this?
And as I said in the other post, how has cheating negatively affected me? I've never been attacked. Maybe some prices went up due to some sort of duping or unattended mining.. so? Gold is endless. I fight stuff, I craft. Players cheating doesn't have an impact on my UO life.
lux113 said:nah, there's nothing but auto open corpses.
I don't know. It's definitely going to be a worse play experience without a 3rd party client, many tasks will be more repetitive, but the screen size issue isn't really a problem now. My fault.
lux113 said:
Still though, in the 3rd party client I speak of you can just click and drag the corner of the player window and just resize to whatever size you want, don't see why that's a difficult feature to add.