Could we get Anti-Virtue Titles

There is a quest line to provide titles for the specific Virtues, which is really nice to have, but not all toons have a positive outlook. Who really wants a Dread Lord with the title The Honorable? Could you consider adding a similar mechanic for the Anti-Virtues? Would be nice to have Anti-Virtue title for my Dread Lady Necro and I'm sure some of the pvp'ers might like a special Anti-Virtue title or perhaps Thieves? There are many negatively leaning toons who have been left behind by the search for a Virtue title. 

Shrine battles in Fel would be a hot mess on LS.

New color tabards!

Guess it can't be done because of Siege 

JenniferMarie said:

How would Siege be an obstacle to this idea? [[Which, by the way, is actually pretty darned fantastic.]]

The Anti-Virtues are essentially tied in with the dungeons [[as anyone who's ever had to memorize it all for Orchard can attest]]. So honestly, all that would need to be done is those mysterious fragment thingies would need a new set of colors and the Anti-Virtue applied behind the scenes, then you just do the appropriate "shrine" (Spirituality for Hythloth, etc.) and then gain an appropriate tabard and title.

So instead of The Spiritual, you'd get The Blasphemous ... or whatever.

Siege "problem" solved?

Since Seige does not have a trammel and fel...

They could do new colors and use in tram. But the real anti virtue players would not be able to do them.

Lust
Gluttony
Greed 
Sloth
Wrath
Envy 
Pride

Need an 8th for symmetry ....

Are we talking anti-virtue or deadly sins? lol

We already have anti-virtues in the game (as seen in the orchard at Shadowguard). No need to over complicate

I was just telling myself a few days ago that I'm being too Hythlothy....and I googled it and it's an old word meaning Pride...which there is already anti virtue for. I think the OP was looking for something to coincide with the virtues, and that would be sins...how's that for being Destard ? Which is another word I goggled and it's a UO word only as far as I found...my advice to the OP is to change the title of the post so those that think they need to immediately chime in and say how we already have Anti virtues, won't do that...

Destard = Dastard = coward, ie the opposite of Valor.

So you're saying Destard is really Dastard ? Can you link to that, otherwise it's just an assumption. And the definition of dastardly is Wicked and Cruel, not cowardly.

Garth_Grey said:

I was just telling myself a few days ago that I'm being too Hythlothy....and I googled it and it's an old word meaning Pride...which there is already anti virtue for. I think the OP was looking for something to coincide with the virtues, and that would be sins...how's that for being Destard ? Which is another word I goggled and it's a UO word only as far as I found...my advice to the OP is to change the title of the post so those that think they need to immediately chime in and say how we already have Anti virtues, won't do that...

While we are at defining words for use in the English language..

Can you give me your definition of immediately? Because I'm assuming you are referring to my comment (which somehow made you butt-hurt) which i made this morning.... 2 days after the OP (and my first on this topic). You and the Devs must have the same definition of immediate because as per them; their bug fixes are also "immediate". 

Garth_Grey said:

Lust
Gluttony
Greed 
Sloth
Wrath
Envy 
Pride

Need an 8th for symmetry ....

Seven deadly sins.  Not UO lore.

You can read about each anti virtue here and see their symbol used in the artisan festival rewards.
https://www.uoguide.com/Anti-Virtues


Hythloth is weird. It has a rock for the symbol. But it's a quarter moon. Which could refer to the moon as a rock.

Each vice could have a title. Add an er or ful to the words in Kevens chart. Wrong and Hythloth would have to be modified.

I agree with @JenniferMarie here that there is no reason receiving the titles would have to be limited to Fel but I would prefer they be offered there at least or maybe only there and make an exception for Siege/Mugen. I mean exceptions are made periodically on how things are done for different servers often. For example, having the event dungeon in Fel on some servers and not on others. 

As for Anti-Virtues I was referring to the list given in UO and found for instance in the orchard. The Titles could be reflective of those. 

Also make an anti virtue tile quest. To go along with it.

keven2002 said:

Garth_Grey said:

I was just telling myself a few days ago that I'm being too Hythlothy....and I googled it and it's an old word meaning Pride...which there is already anti virtue for. I think the OP was looking for something to coincide with the virtues, and that would be sins...how's that for being Destard ? Which is another word I goggled and it's a UO word only as far as I found...my advice to the OP is to change the title of the post so those that think they need to immediately chime in and say how we already have Anti virtues, won't do that...

While we are at defining words for use in the English language..

Can you give me your definition of immediately? Because I'm assuming you are referring to my comment (which somehow made you butt-hurt) which i made this morning.... 2 days after the OP (and my first on this topic). You and the Devs must have the same definition of immediate because as per them; their bug fixes are also "immediate". 

dot dot dot

Garth_Grey said:

Lust
Gluttony
Greed 
Sloth
Wrath
Envy 
Pride

Need an 8th for symmetry ....

“Pretty sure the last one is Doc
everyone always forgets Doc”

😂 Grumpy was always my favorite ...

I love this idea and I love the idea of the shrine battles being in Fel. I know, though, that so many people would be upset if they were only in Fel. 

I think you can be lustful, gluttonous, greedy, slothful, wrathful, envious and prideful all in Tram but there should be one(s) for Fel shrines. Are you really a dread lord/lady if you never venture there? Are you really someone to envied and feared if you spend all your time in Trammel? I mean, it is a rp game but still ... 

And I'm not saying this to cast aspersions on anyone or their playstyle. I'm just saying that if you want a title, then you should really have to earn it. I can go kill dogs all day and get to be Dread Lady but really, I'm just a coward who kills dogs. 

Speaking of Doc, why not a title for someone who heals others more than other players. Can that kind of thing even be tracked? 

Doc-healer
Grumpy-a lot of their text looks like !@#$* from too much in-game swearing
Bashful-Hides in war mode a lot
Sleepy-only logs in at night
Happy-lots of !!! and 🙂 in their in-game chat
Sneezy-miners? picking wheat a lot? Gardener?
Dopey-I have no idea! I feel dopiest when I recall somewhere and realize it's not what I meant to do and recall somewhere else immediately. Or maybe ... someone who eats those special mushrooms as their main source of food and uses petals and potions a LOT haha! I don't think Dopey was that kind of dwarf but ... we don't know!

There is no single reason why possible anti-virtue titles could be get from trammel side. Anti-virtues comes by shadowlords so if it would be possible get those titles from trammel side could as well move shadowlords faction to trammel side too.

JenniferMarie said:

I will never understand why people in this game seem to think that Fel is the ONLY place where "bad" people are.

Yes, Fel = PvP ... but there are plenty of bad actors in Tram. I'd argue some people who never go to Fel are actually worse than straight PKs because at least you expect a PK to kill you.

I agree. Majority of what I see posted on here when talking about Fel are people basically making it seem like all of Fel is the equivalent of Bucs Den where only unsavory people hang out which couldn't be further from the truth. There are a lot of good people that go to Fel.

The thing about Fel that most of the nay sayers overlook is that there is actually some sort of checks and balance system for people who want to be a "bad" person. Act like a jerk in Fel outside of town and there is a chance you will get PK'ed for it (or if you are a red player in general) versus doing the same thing in Tram even at the deepest level of Deceit nothing will happen. Just about any scam I hear about takes place in Tram so it's not like nothing bad happens there... it's just when something bad does actually happen you are powerless to actually do anything about it.

Posters have been asking for encounters in fel. This is perfect for that. Shrine battles are usually a group event. And done thru chat on LS at least.

So yall do not want encounters in fel?  I am not a fel fan but I would get new color tabards if it is there.

JenniferMarie said:

Do you purposefully ignore things that are ACTUALLY said, or do you just skim over people's responses without fully paying attention?

Not being snarky, I am genuinely asking. Because it has been stated specifically multiple times that something like this SHOULD be available in Fel - just not ONLY Fel.

I, personally, am firmly in the "if it's in Tram, it should be available in Fel also" camp. Beyond champ spawns, I don't see a point in things being just one or the other. I enjoy that trade deals from Tram cities can be carried into Fel for other rewards. I run champ spawns, and when Treasures Of ... events are in both Tram and Fel I typically choose to do them in Fel.

So where in the world did you get that people don't want something like this in Fel?

I read what you say and think this should be in fel. I do not agree that it should be in tram. If you want anti virtues then go do it in fel.

Not going to happen anyway.  

But they should do another Black Gate quest for the other 8 stones.

Garth_Grey said:

Lust
Gluttony
Greed 
Sloth
Wrath
Envy 
Pride

Need an 8th for symmetry ....

JenniferMarie said:

Virtue: Compassionate vs. Anti-Virtue: Tyrannical

Virtue: Honorable vs. Anti-Virtue: Shameful

Virtue: Honest vs. Anti-Virtue: Deceitful

Virtue: Humble vs. Anti-Virtue: Insolent

Virtue: Just vs. Anti-Virtue: Corrupt

Virtue: Sacrificing vs. Anti-Virtue: Greedy

Virtue: Spiritual vs. Anti-Virtue: Irreverent

Virtue: Valiant vs. Anti-Virtue: Cowardly

... it's not too terribly difficult.

Also, to my initial replay to this post and the criticism it received: the Anti-Virtue titles could be gotten in either Fel or Tram which would allow Siege/Mugen to have access to them as well as any red characters on every other shard.

 This ^^^ 

I like the idea of these anti-virtue titles instead of necessarily using the current dungeon names.   Trick is finding a fun way to incorporate them that would have some replay value, like the current Shrine spawn fight system used for the virtues.    

Best way to do it is to have the "Shrine Battles" not at the shrines, but at the anti-virtue dungeons themselves.

UO's theology is different from Christian theology. So the Seven Deadly Sins or Seven Cardinal Sins are out. UO has "Sins" or "Anti-Virtues" that are opposite to the Virtues. (Here's something to consider: The Seven Deadly Sins are less "sins" in the sense of actions and more human traits that draw people to sin. As I recall they aren't in the Bible but emerged from Medieval theology.)

keven2002 said:

JenniferMarie said:

I will never understand why people in this game seem to think that Fel is the ONLY place where "bad" people are.

Yes, Fel = PvP ... but there are plenty of bad actors in Tram. I'd argue some people who never go to Fel are actually worse than straight PKs because at least you expect a PK to kill you.

t there is actually some sort of checks and balance system for people who want to be a "bad" person. Act like a jerk in Fel outside of town and there is a chance you will get PK'ed for it

Many seem confused to me.

Felucca should have the Virtues, as the good, honourable, brave people live there.

Trammel Easy Mode should have the Anti Virtues as the Lazy, Prideful, Cowardly, Slothlike, Deceitful, Shameful, Corrupt, Greedy players play there.

Everyone see's and knows this, but no-one can admit it. 🙂

Don't take this as insulting, I'm sure you don't all mean it as an insult when you all mistakenly get it wrong and quote it incorrectly vice-versa.

Mariah said:

Some posts have been removed, please do not start with the personal attacks and erroneous assumptions about other players.

*looks at the post above yours, then reads this post, and shrugs*

@Mariah That would mean you clearly have good days and bad days and are ready for each! 

JohnKnighthawke said:

Mariah said:

Some posts have been removed, please do not start with the personal attacks and erroneous assumptions about other players.

*looks at the post above yours, then reads this post, and shrugs*

Maybe I'm role playing, and you don't get it 🙂

Maybe I'm trolling, maybe I'm being serious - maybe it is all of the above.

But it was not personal, it was me holding up a mirror to the many who blithely carry-on life with just one viewpoint and think they are right 🙂

Like I said, no need to feel insulted, so many posts hold the opposite viewpoint, and do not think they are being insulting. 🙂

For an opinion on the original Topic - for sure - have the Anti Virtue titles - but then my point becomes extremely valid - Surely Felucca should have the Virtue Titles, and Trammel the Anti-Virtues ?

I tend to find myself in agreement with @Cookie as far as the idea that Virtue Titles should be fought in Fel, as that is where the Virtuous would go to fight evil and that those seeking an Anti-Virtue title would seek it out in Tram, as they would wish to fight those who held positive Virtues. Unfortunately, we a rule set which prohibits those who commit crimes from venturing into Tram and thus they would have no path to an Anti-Virtue title. 

I believe the best alternative is to have shrine wars allowing the titles on both shards.  

Cookie said:

JohnKnighthawke said:

Mariah said:

Some posts have been removed, please do not start with the personal attacks and erroneous assumptions about other players.

*looks at the post above yours, then reads this post, and shrugs*

Maybe I'm role playing, and you don't get it 🙂

Maybe I'm trolling, maybe I'm being serious - maybe it is all of the above.

But it was not personal, it was me holding up a mirror to the many who blithely carry-on life with just one viewpoint and think they are right 🙂

Like I said, no need to feel insulted, so many posts hold the opposite viewpoint, and do not think they are being insulting. 🙂

For an opinion on the original Topic - for sure - have the Anti Virtue titles - but then my point becomes extremely valid - Surely Felucca should have the Virtue Titles, and Trammel the Anti-Virtues ?

Whenever anyone proposes anything be added to the game, someone comes along and says it should only be in Felucca, because playing in Felucca makes you superior, and the gimpy poorly-balanced PVP in UO is actually the crucible of all character and meaning. To the extent that it's anything other than predictable background noise at this point, it's comical.

Nobody cares. Someone has repeated this routine literally every time anything has ever been added to the game in the last twenty-two years and it never happens and nobody ever cares. It's been actual decades at this point, and the part where the developers decide that playing PVP makes you so special and important that they should create exclusive content for you just isn't coming.